What the work covers

Measured, not guessed

Every change starts from a measurement — Lighthouse, real transfer sizes, axe accessibility runs — and the same measurement is repeated afterwards so the effect is evidence rather than opinion.

Accessibility as correctness

Keyboard access, focus visibility, contrast, reduced motion, forced colours and screen-reader behaviour, checked automatically and by hand where automation cannot reach.

Technical SEO

Metadata, structured data, canonicals, language alternates, sitemap, robots and crawlability — the parts that determine whether good content can rank at all.

Support that is written down

What is covered, what is not, and how to reach me, agreed in advance instead of assumed.

What you receive

A before-and-after report with the actual numbers
Automated accessibility and browser tests you keep
The fixes implemented, not only a list of recommendations
An agreed support arrangement with a defined scope

A good fit when

The site is slow, or fails an accessibility requirement you have to meet
Good content is not ranking and you suspect something technical
Nobody currently checks whether the forms still work
You want a defined support arrangement rather than ad-hoc requests

Probably not a fit when

The site needs rebuilding — optimising a broken structure is more expensive than replacing it
You are looking for a guaranteed ranking position, which nobody can honestly promise